by Jacob Houghie, (Policy Associate, 24/25)
Overview:
Oxford SU delivered two research-led reports focused on undergraduate assessment and cost of study. These were developed through extensive engagement with students across divisions, including surveys, focus groups, and rep-led consultations.
Key themes identified:
- High-stakes, final-year assessments are a significant source of stress, particularly for disabled and care-experienced students.
- Assessment formats lack diversity, with limited alignment to pedagogical methods or student support needs.
- Eligibility gaps in financial support leave some students without adequate resources, particularly those just above bursary thresholds.
- Costs associated with core study activities (fieldwork, printing, extended residence) are inconsistently disclosed and funded across colleges.
- Hardship application processes were widely described as opaque, emotionally burdensome, and stigmatising.
Outcomes:
These findings have been shared with the Taught Degrees and Awards Panel (TDAP), Quality Assurance Subcommittee (QASC), Student Life Committee, and Fees & Funding, with the expectation that the incoming sabbatical team will continue this engagement in 2025–26. We are also engaging with colleges, recognising that meaningful change on cost and support structures must include the collegiate layer.